Microwave sickness is becoming more common as wireless radiation exposure increases in our environment. FCC safety guidelines are inadequate & do not protect public health. They do not consider long-term exposure to pulsed modulated non-ionizing wireless radiation at non-thermal levels. Cumulative daily radiation exposure is associated with serious health effects. This I know.
Until about six year ago I had no idea there was a need for “safer technology.” I’d been using computers ever since the 1970’s, though I didn't get my first cell phone until about 90% of Americans owned one. Within about six months I began experiencing constant burning pain whenever I put the phone to my ear.
My partner was trained to repair Huey helicopter radios during the Vietnam War. He said it was drilled into them every day that radiofrequency radiation is dangerous and it could kill you. So I began using the cell phone on speaker-phone only. The pain went away and was gone for about two years.
Then our natural gas provider installed two new utility meters on our property. The installers assured us the new meters only transmit once a month for the meter reading. So we agreed to the installations.
After about 3 months I began to develop unusual rashes on my body, then at 6 months the pain returned to my ear without provocation on my part. I called the gas company and got the specifications on the new meters. In truth, I was told, the new meters PULSED radiofrequency microwave radiation continuously, over 10 pulses per minute.
Over the next 5 months my health took the deepest, fastest dive in my life.
The gas company had no opt-out to their new meters, so I complained to the Michigan Public Service Commission, the Michigan Attorney General’s office, and the Better Business Bureau. None of them could or would help me. If we wanted natural gas service, per the natural gas company’s regional director, we were stuck with these meters that were destroying my health.
At that point our two dogs were experiencing alarming symptoms also. So we consulted with a building biologist in training and per her advice, shielded the meters to block the radiation from coming into our living areas, and I began to turn electric breakers to the bedroom off at night.
Within two hours of shielding the pulses of radiation coming from the utility meters, the dog’s symptoms disappeared. I had become much more ill and overly sensitized to electromagnetic fields, and my recovery has taken much longer.
In my search for answers to what was happening to my health and why, I found several websites that help to address this issue, and many more websites are listed on the right of this blog page under For More Information:
Please support all actions and legislation that help to protect people, plants, animals, insects, and wildlife... this planet in general, from excessive exposure to manmade wireless technology. Thank you.
Allegedly... I'm sorry. He said. I'm sorry about installing this radiation emitting device outside your home. It's my job. And I'm paid well to do it. But. And there is. A "but." But I know... Radiation in our environment, AKA "electrosmog"... It's making people sick. Animals too. Yeah, I know. But I'm sorry. It's my job. And I'm paid well. To do it. * * * [Caption on the image from HERE: In the Puranas it was predicted that toward the end of Kali Yuga humanity would be driven to acts of madness. It is very dangerous that people do not recognize this state...But how do you explain to people that their leaders and their teachers are insane? ~Agni Yoga, Supermundane, (1938)]
Biologically safe levels for long-term exposure to pulsed modulated non-ionizing wireless radiation at non-thermal levels, what today's wireless technology exposes us to, have never been established by any United States health regulatory agency.Current safety guidelines are based upon the heating of tissue, or thermal effects, from short-term exposures only, and do not consider long-term non-thermal effects.
"The RFR (radiofrequency radiation) exposure limits were designed to protect the general public only from heating risks due to short-term exposure to this type of non-ionizing radiation. The limits were not designed to protect individuals from chronic exposure to low-intensity (i.e., non-thermal levels of) RFR. Yet the preponderance of peer-reviewed research on low-intensity RFR exposure finds biological effects and adverse health effects." ~ Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D., Director of the Center for Family and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley | Worldwide Radio Frequency Radiation Exposure Limits versus Health Effects
In 2002 (and prior) the EPA questioned the adequacy of the current U.S. RFR safety guidelines established by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in 1996. Yet U.S. RFR exposure guidelines are still the same today as they were in 1996, and are based upon thermal, or heating effects, only. They still do not consider long-term exposure at non-thermal levels.
The 4G / 5G small cell antenna infrastructure is creating long-term exposures to exponentially higher levels of RFR at non-thermal levels. NO safety is assured.
If someone tells you that 5G technology is going to use lower power or lower energy levels than 4G and 3G (and therefore assumed 'safer'), let them know it's not the power levels or energy levels that elicit the most severe adverse biological effects. It's the pulses and modulation that appear to be so biologically damaging, according to the scientists and medical professionals who have been studying this issue (see images HERE for a better understanding of modulation).
The 5G wireless infrastructure is in ADDITION to the 3G / 4G infrastructure, adding exponential levels of RFR to our environment, with no biological health impact or environmental impact assessment.
Large cell towers are not being removed as the 4G / 5G infrastructure is being built. In fact, many large cell towers are getting taller with more cells and antenna. RFR measurements are increasing exponentially across Michigan as the 4G / 5G infrastructure is being installed.
Because safe levels for long-term exposure to pulsed modulated non-ionizing RFR at non-thermal levels have never been established, we have absolutely NO assurance of safety from any of the wireless technology we are exposed to over the long-term.
We can limit cell phone use, use speaker-phone or air-tubes, turn WiFi 'off' at night, and shield 'smart' meter RFR. But when a small cell antenna is installed on a light pole outside our bedroom window, our options to avoid excessive untested exposure to RFR (already making some people very ill) are limited.
This is why we need an immediate moratorium on wireless infrastructure expansion including small cell antenna installations until safe levels for long-term exposure to pulsed modulated non-ionizing RFR at non-thermal levels are established.
To protect your health, and the health of your loved-ones, please contact state lawmakers and ask for legislation placing a moratorium on wireless expansion until a systematic review of the science is done by independent researchers without conflicts of interest, and safe levels are established for long-term exposure to pulsed modulated non-ionizing RFR at non-thermal levels.
“In a herd of deer, we need some super-sensitive ones. They are the ones that will hear that teeniest little crack, or smell the one or two molecules of scent from the mountain lion that’s stalking them. Their job is to use their hyper-sensitivity to alert the whole group.”
Too bad humanity is taking so dang long to realize that the same applies to us. We have sensitive ones in regards to exposure to non-ionizing wireless radiation at non-thermal levels. And still, for the most part, we are being ignored...
"Yes, what you can do is that you can create fake science that essentially imagines that the agent that you depend on, has no health effects whatsoever. If you look back in time, there was what I would call it heat war in the past, there wasn’t only a Cold War, there was a heat war. What this means is that the nations of the East, the Eastern Bloc, said that this radiation is dangerous, and they adopted standards at thousand times lower than the United States. "By contrast, in the United States the mentality was there's so much money to be made, we will have very high standards. In other words, there’s no effect beyond what happens in the microwave oven. And this will allow us to deploy unlimited amounts of systems."
US Senator Blumenthal Raises Concerns on 5G Wireless Technology Health Risks at United States Senate Hearing
"We're kind of... flying blind here, as far as health and safety is concerned."
Actually... not "blind" when you take into consideration the studies that have been done using millimeter waves and wireless microwave radio frequency radiation:
And that is just a small fraction of studies done showing biological effects from wireless microwave radio frequency radiation. There are literally thousands...
So we're not kind of flying blind here.
What IS happening is the Federal Communications Commission and the Food and Drug Administration, those who are supposed to protect public health and public safety, are blatantly disregarding the evidence of harm.
There's no question that the "possibility" of harm exists with wireless radiofrequency radiation. 5G infrastructure with perhaps hundreds of thousands of new small cell antennas installed just about everywhere, including in front of our homes, increases that "possibility" exponentially.
"There is. Just a small one. It might kill you... This is an experiment on humanity and that this should be called a crime under international law... Science shows that this causes DNA damage, cancer, among other things..."
"Wireless radiation has biological effects. Period. This is no longer a subject for debate when you look at PubMed and the peer-review literature. These effects are seen in all life forms; plants, animals, insects, microbes. In humans we have clear evidence of cancer now. There is no question. We have evidence of DNA damage, cardiomyopathy, which is the precursor of congestive heart failure, neuropsychiatric effects..."
Michele Greenstein:
"There's going to be a cell tower in front of every few houses..."
Dr. David Carpenter:
"There's been no safety testing of 5G. The reason I think that it's dangerous is that there isn't any specific information to 5G, but we know that radiofrequency radiation of 3G and 4G are associated with a whole variety of different human health effects. Everyone is going to be exposed to radiofrequency radiation more continuously and at higher intensities, and that's going to cause more human disease."
Michele Greenstein:
"And the fact is the government is completely not jumping on the ball because of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 which says that no state or local government can regulate the placement of any cell towers regardless of environmental effects. That has really laid the groundwork for this toxic infrastructure... And the FCC, which has no health expertise itself, is completely captured by the wireless industry..."
"You know who hasn't been fooled? The insurance companies. They are not selling any product liability policies that cover cell phone radiation..."
"Scientists, environmental groups, doctors and citizens around the world are appealing to all governments to halt telecommunications companies’ deployment of 5G (fifth generation) wireless networks, which they call 'an experiment on humanity and the environment that is defined as a crime under international law.' Research has shown that wireless radiation can cause DNA damage, neuropsychiatric effects and other health problems. RT America’s Michele Greenstein joins Rick Sanchez to discuss."
Sharon Goldberg is an Integrative/Functional Medicine physician in private practice. Her background includes fifteen years as an academic Hospital Medicine physician and clinician educator who helped train hundreds of medical students and resident physicians. She was an Assistant Professor at New York City’s Mount Sinai Hospital; Albert Einstein College of Medicine and at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine. She is board certified in Internal Medicine and Integrative Medicine, and has advanced training in Tropical Medicine and Hygiene from the Gorgas Memorial Institute in Lima, Peru. Her clinical and research interests include dietary, lifestyle and environmental modifications in the setting of complex chronic disease. Dr. Goldberg has clinical expertise in environmental intolerance including Microwave Sickness (Electro-Sensitivity).
David Carpenter, MD Director, Institute for Health and the Environment University of Albany, NY
Professor David Carpenter, MD is a world renowned public health expert, including the issue of electromagnetic fields and wireless radiation. He is currently the Director of the Institute for Health and Environment, in the University of Albany, a collaborating center for the World Health Organization. He is also a Professor of Environmental Health Sciences within the School of Public Health at the University at Albany.
Previously, he was Chairman of the Neurobiology Department of Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute at the Defense Nuclear Agency in Washington, DC. He was also the Director of Wadsworth Center for Laboratories and Research of the New York State Department of Health, the third largest public health laboratory in the US after NIH and CDC.
He holds several research positions including at the National Institutes of Mental Health. Dr. Carpenter’s research initially was basic neurobiology, and more recently has primarily been the study of human disease resulting from exposure to environmental contaminants including non-ionizing radiation.
Dr Carpenter is a Harvard trained physician and researcher. He is author of more than 350 scientific papers; has edited five books; and he is the Editor in Chief of two scientific journals.
Prof. Carpenter’s work on Non-Ionizing radiation started when he arrived in Albany in 1980 as the Director of the Wadsworth Laboratories of the New York State Department of Health, he was given the responsibility of administering a program to determine whether there were adverse human health effects of electromagnetic fields (EMFs), initiated because of concern of hazards from high voltage powerlines. A 5 million dollar research program was begun, and when finished in 1987 the program concluded that while there were effects of EMFs on many organ systems, a particular concern was an increased incidence of leukemia in children living in home with elevated magnetic fields. After that time Dr. Carpenter became for the spokesperson for New York State on issues related to EMFs. He has continued to evaluate research in this area, and has edited two books and written several review articles on the subject. He testified before the President’s Cancer Panel in 2009 on human health effects of both power line and radiofrequency EMFs from a variety of sources, particularly from cell phones. He is the Co-Editor of the Bioinitiative Report (www.bioinitiative.org), published first in 2007 and revised in 2012. This is a comprehensive review of the effects of EMFs.
Claire Edwards, UN staff member, addresses UN Secretary General:
Mr. Secretary General, UN staff have repeatedly been told that they are the most important resource of this organization. Since December 2015, the staff here at the Vienna International Center have been exposed to off-the-scale electromagnetic radiation (EMR) from WiFi and mobile phone boosters installed on very low ceilings throughout the buildings.
Current public exposure levels are at least one quintillion (1,000,000,000,000,000,000) - that's eighteen zeros - one quintillion times above natural background radiation, according to Professor Olle Johansson of the Karolinska Institute in Sweden.
The highly dangerous biological effects of EMFs have been documented by thousands of studies since 1932, indicating that we may be facing a global health catastrophe orders of magnitude worse than those caused by tobacco and cigarettes.
Mr. Secretary General, on the basis of the precautionary principle I urge you to have these EMF-emitting devices removed immediately from these buildings, and to call a halt to any roll-out of 5G at UN duty stations, because 5G is designed to deliver concentrated and focused electromagnetic radiation in excess of 100 times current levels, in the same way as do directed energy weapons.
In line with the UN guiding principles on business and human rights - to protect, respect, and remedy - 5G technologies must be subjected to an independent health and safety assessment before they are launched anywhere in the world.
There is currently an international appeal signed by 237 EMF scientists from 41 nations, urging the UN and particularly the WHO to exert strong leadership in fostering the development of more protective EMF guidelines, encouraging precautionary measures and educating the public about the considerable health risks, particularly the risks to children and fetal development.
Mr. Secretary General, I think we have a unique opportunity here at the UN office at Vienna. Since our medical records are digitized, you have the choice on the possibility of releasing data on a closed population exposed to off-the-scale levels of electromagnetic radiation in a metal-walled building, which exacerbates the situation, to establish if there have already been abnormal health consequences for the UN staff here, in the last 28 months. I urge you to do so, and stop any roll-out of 5G immediately.
"Cell phones cause cancer. That's what numerous doctors and scientists from all around the world have been warning us about for years... I for one happen to KNOW that cell phones DO cause cancer..."
Jimmy Gonzalez developed cancers and tumors in three places related to his cell phone use:
His left hand where he held his cell phone during use
The left side of his head where he placed his cell phone when in use
His lower chest where he stored his cell phone when not in use
From the video description:
Jimmy Gonzalez's testimony to the Pembroke Pines Commission resulted in the passing of a Resolution to raise awareness on the health risks of cell phone radiation.
Learn more about the state of science on cell phone radiation at The Environmental Health Trust. Several cities and countries are taking action to raise awareness about how people can protect themselves.
But only if we listen and act upon the information Jimmy and others have shared. Information is useless unless it's used.
History shows us that sometimes government agencies are not the first to act when it comes to protecting the health and safety of the public. So if you are waiting for some kind of "official" announcement, well, please listen to Jimmy again. Regarding teens and adolescents using cell phones...
Malignant brain tumors are the most common cause of cancer deaths in adolescents and young adults aged 15-39, and are the most common cancer occurring in 15-19 year-olds.
Fifteen to 19 year-olds were born between 1998/1999 and 2002/2003. In 2002, a little over 60% of Americans used a cellphone (Pew Research Center). That means today's adolescents more than likely grew up with parents that used a cellphone and perhaps became early users themselves. Currently 100% of people between the ages of 18 and 29 in the U.S. own a cellphone (see Pew Research Center link above). And now malignant brain tumors are the most common cause of cancer deaths in that age group.
In 2012 I bought my first cell phone. Less than a year later I had to stop putting it to my ear because of constant burning pain I felt when I did. Perhaps I'm one of the "lucky" ones, to feel the pain. Though I don't think luck had anything to do with it, and I'm not the only one that feels electromagnetic fields. There are many others. We are the evidence that wireless technology can and does cause harm. Jimmy tried to tell us this before he died.
My wish for 2019: It will be the year of massive awareness of wireless radiation health effects, along with massive mitigation, correction, retraction, repayment, reorganization, and elimination regarding wireless technology and high electromagnetic fields (EMFs), (according to Building Biologist standards), which includes but is not limited to: "smart" meters, transmitting utility meters, 5G small cell towers, mega cell towers, WiFi in schools, and "dirty electricity". Safe levels of wireless radiation need to be determined and strictly followed and enforced in public areas. For the health of it! For our children, and our children's children's children. It is time to stop this EMF freight-train and put 'er in reverse...
Starling W. Childs, M.S., Geologist and Forestry Consultant, Adjunct Faculty, Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, President, Berkshire-Litchfield Environmental Council:
"We've known, certainly, that electromagnetic fields affected trees..."
Of critical importance to humans, trees play a major role in producing the oxygen we breathe and cleaning carbon dioxide out of the air. They also stabilize the environment, prevent erosion, and provide food and shelter for wildlife. One large tree can provide a day's supply of oxygen for four people.
But trees, like humans, are affected by electromagnetic fields.
Cell towers (large mega-towers, 5G or 5th Generation small cells, DAS nodes/towers), antenna, smart meters and other wireless transmitting utility meters (electric, natural gas and water), WiFi, cellphones, and other wireless devices introduced in the U.S. within the last 40 years or so, all create electromagnetic fields we were not exposed to previously.
The majority of people in the U.S. were still using land-lines prior to 2002, and at that time Internet was "largely stationary," which means that everything was hard-wired, not wireless.
More facts and information about the demographics of mobile device ownership and adoption in the U.S. can be found HERE.
The above picture shows how one tree was damaged by a nearby cell tower. More images and information on how "Wireless Kills Trees," can be found HERE.
This above image shows a vine surrounding a 'smart' meter in Ontario Canada, and the dangerous effects spiked (pulse modulated) transmitting utility meter radiation has. Image and story HERE.
In a school experiment, the plate of cress seeds on the LEFT were germinated in a school room that had WiFi routers. The plate on the RIGHT was germinated in another room without any WiFi routers.
The cress on the left were clearly affected by the electromagnetic fields from the WiFi router. Read the full story HERE.
Within the last several years, electromagnetic fields in our everyday environment have increased exponentially, and with the "roll-out" of 5G small cell towers, it will only increase more exponentially.
"Wireless radiation has biological effects. Period."
Instead of ignoring the evidence of harm done by wireless technology, let's begin to reduce our exposure so that we don't end up like the cress on the left, mutated and/or dead, prematurely.
For more information on this seriously important topic, please see:
We apologize for the poor recording, nonetheless it is the message David conveys which is important. David was asked by Dafna Tachover to speak at a conference in Edina, Minnesota on Dec. 16th, 2018. Here is David's speech...
I was going to give the speech I did for 4H but it was judged as too scary so I decided to make copies for you to take home. I'm standing here tonight because my mom has microwave illness and it has truly been a scary ride. I know from personal experience that many people don't believe, I see it with our own family. What I am going to try to do with the help of my mom and dad is prove to you that you are being affected, every day, 24/7. Feel free to talk with my parents later. My dad who is an electrician can show how you are affected with a simple experiment later using a voltometer.. (The HF38B meter was discussed prior to his speech and he mentions this during his talk, skipping this paragraph.)
Right now I am going to let you hear the microwaves we are being exposed to with this meter called an HF 38B Analyser. It can measure from 800 megahertz to 2.5 gigahertz which means it can track cell phones, cell towers, smart meters etc. I want to impress upon you that the radiation this meter is picking up is what is going right through your body right now, and it is not healthy.
What became a turning point in my mom's growing health issues occurred when mom ended up in the ER for a heart attack. I was scared to death looking at her on the ground. I don't like to think of it. After going through the cardiologists tests my mom was told that nothing was wrong with her, that her heart was stronger than the average person! This made my parents upset, because they had been going to a lot of doctors and had been getting the same response. We knew she was not well, and it was getting worse. My dad who had worked for the Dresden nuclear facility then took a step back and looked at the big picture realizing that mom was showing signs of radiation sickness. He immediately took action...
A professional was hired to come to our home. He brought cases of really cool equipment and he checked our home inside and out. We got rid of the cordless phones, microwave, WiFi and kept our cell phones off, the pro also found a ton of dirty electricity coming in through our water line. He did what he could but unfortunately it was not enough for my mom's sake. Our neighborhood had just had smart meters deployed and though we refused one our neighbor's meter which was facing our home was blowing pulsed radiation right through us every 8 to 10 seconds 24/7! The pro also showed us the readings coming from the cell towers surrounding us, and to top it off we were a block away from the high line wires.
Just to make it bearable for my mom until we found a place my dad bought foil backed insulation boards and we made the most awesome forts to live in. My friend Charlie loved it.
I shared this story not because I want people to feel sorry for me, they should feel sorry for the ones who like my mom are misdiagnosed.
We are now looking at moving to Idaho where my mom will be able to go outside ALL day in a far more healthy environment for us all. I am excited and so is my dad. We are a family that knows the truth, regardless of those who do not believe us, we know, and we'll keep informing those who'll heed our warning, for WE ARE THE EVIDENCE.
(And the first comment authored by the video channel):
Below is the 4H speech David mentions, which was termed as too "scary." David received 1st alternative to state for this speech titled You, Me & 5G... How many of you have a smart home? If you do it is an unhealthy home. What if I told you ALL biological life here on Earth is in danger?...and that this danger is something you cannot see, hear, taste or feel unless you've become sensitive to it? Have any of you wondered about the massive die off of the world's bee population.
Our world has had one significant change that I would like to mention, and it has occurred within the last 125 years, that change is man made radiation from electricity. From your cell phone to nuclear subs, radiation is permeating our planet affecting ALL biological life and the accumulative effects will continue to cause harm with the introduction of 5G.
You may ask, what is 5G? To put it bluntly 5G is solely for the purpose of machines, not biological beings. Those who sing its praise say it will usher in a new age for the Internet of Things, or IoT by connecting all wireless devices. This Internet of THINGS, NOT BEINGS, should give us pause because it is being deployed without the public's knowledge, and it's implementation is going against the proven warnings from doctors and scientists alike worldwide whose main concern is the damage to our health from accumulated exposure to this radiation.
The people who push 5G care about money and control. Consider this fact...5G has NOT been shown to be safe, but then again 4G, 3G, 2G, our smart meters, and cell phones haven't been proven safe either. In fact quite the opposite! So with this knowledge would you believe them?
Think about the hundreds of thousands of deaths from smoking, asbestos, mercury, PCBs & lead paint all said to be safe at one time. Unlike smoking, there is no way you can get away from the radiation we are being exposed to daily. Some say 5G will be great, but for who? Are we just going to take THEIR word for it?
Think about it this way...cell phone use has grown rapidly and like drug pushers, the product has been juiced up and we've become addicted to this tech. They know this, and like drug pushers they act with little to no regard concerning the damage their product is doing to our health.
Scientist's have shown that there is extensive cellular damage from microwave radiation at levels far lower than what it takes to heat tissue. We are surrounded by radiation in and outside of our homes from baby monitors to cell towers, even our cars are drowning us in damaging radiation. 5G will put millions of radiation emitting cells on our buildings, bus stops, and street lights. These mini cell towers will even be put in our front yards! Would you want this in front of your home?
A newly published study out of Israel clearly shows 5G frequencies will affect all biological beings.
In 2017 more than 180 doctors and scientists from 35 countries around the world presented a scientific appeal stating the deadly affects from this radiation.
It has been scientifically proven repeatedly that there is a link between wireless radiation and a host of serious illness. Unfortunately people who start to succumb to the effects are often misdiagnosed, in many cases their symptoms are deemed hereditary when it could clearly be shown to be environmental.
We are all different and because of this our symptoms are also. Look at Lyme's to see how varied the reactions are, so to with radiation.
For some it may simply start as headaches and or fatigue, for others it may be ADHD, but as the gradual accumulation of radiation continues the individual symptoms will become more pronounced and health issues pile on top of what your body is already expressing.
At some point all those symptoms could become life threatening.
Each and every one of you sitting here today are being affected, right here, right now. So the question I would like to leave you with is this...
